The City of Brotherly Love: Review of Philadelphia

Classic from the Vault

Philadelphia (1993)

Director: Jonathan Demme

By Alex Watson

Tom Hanks is one of the safest pairs of hands at the box office, ever since Forrest Gump told viewers that his mama told him ‘Life was like a box of choc—olates’ he has become a firm favourite. But what is the real appeal of this man? Perhaps his greatest quality as actor is that he appears to be like every other man and therefore is capable of bringing us performances that are very believable and very heartfelt. Perhaps his greatest hour was his most surprising performance playing a homo-sexual lawyer dying of AIDS in Jonathan Demme’s Philadelphia. Here he would give a performance that would pull at the heartstrings

When hot shot lawyer Andrew Beckett (Tom Hanks) is fired from his prestigious job at a large corporate law firm due to apparent incompetence, he knows that in reality he has been fired because his boss Charles Wheeler (Jason Robards) knows he has AIDS. Seeking justice, Beckett is repeatedly turned by other lawyers to sue his firm. With nowhere else to go he turns to former rival Joe Miller (Denzel Washington). Miller is admittedly homophobic and at first is uncomfortable around Andrew- but together the two will overcome adversity and get the retribution deserved.

Philadelphia was the first movie to acknowledge not only AIDS and HIV but also the discrimination caused by homophobia. All the way through the sense of in-justice looms heavily, when Andrew is called a meeting with Wheeler and his associates, we can see the thinly veiled disgusted on Wheeler face as he gives a fake speech about Andrew’s ‘limited abilities’ when just days before he was made senior partner! His former employers are the true villains of the film and through their narrow mindedness they are willing throw a capable man on the scrap heap because he is not like them.

This picture was made by Jonathan Demme in response to a minor backlash against his previous picture The Silence of the Lambs depicting a serial killer as homosexual. Realizing awareness was needed, Demme made this picture to make Hollywood wake up to a wider world.

The main pairing of Miller and Beckett is where the film works best because here it really is a case of opposites attracting. When we first meeting Miller although he is family man, he still isn’t likeable due to his homophobic attitude. In his first meeting Andrew he runs to the doctor due to he fears of infection and is laughed out the building. But Miller respects fair play and when he sees Andrew being discriminated by a bigoted librarian, he is able to overcome his attitude to help Andrew through his plight, as he describes to another lawyer “Some of these people make me sick. But a law’s been broken here. You do remember the law, don’t you?”

In the courtroom scenes, director Demme refuses to release the potential fireworks and this sense of underwhelming works perfectly with the balance of the film. Beckett doesn’t want any impassioned speeches; he simply wants justice for his embarrassment. There are some great moments none the less particular when gives a tough cross examination to regretful associate  and asks him whether he is homosexual? When the associate avoids the question, Miller hits home with “Are you a homo? Are you a queer? Are you a faggot? Are you a fruit? Are you *gay*, sir?” In the end this line of questioning is the break through needed and very soon Beckett gets the result he deserves.

Tom Hanks gives a fantastic performance as Beckett, to those who are familiar with him in his more family related films- this role may come as surprise. But none the less he holds the central with such presence and even when Beckett’s condition worsens, Hanks still gives him a strength that runs throughout Philadelphia. He is ably supported by Denzel Washington, who as Miller gains our respect throughout, although tough hearted in the early stages, Washington gives him a human touch that warms his character to us.

As the villain Jason Robard is memorably nasty as Charles Wheeler, his distaste for homosexual triggers the sad events of the film. Even in the face of Beckett’s eventual death, Wheeler refuses to drop his steely attitude and it is this that will lead to his downfall.

Philadelphia is probably one of the Tom Hank’s lesser watched films among cinema goers (despite his Oscar win), but by far it gives his greatest performance and shows his big range as an actor. For any Hanks fans I would recommend digging this out because it is one of the most thought provoking films from years gone by. But there will no talks of chocolates boxes here I’m afraid!

The Man in Black: Review of Killing Them Softly

Killing Them Softly

Director: Andrew Dominik

By Alex Watson

When it was announced that megastar Brad Pitt would re-unite with The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford director Andrew Dominik, the film world simply clapped their hands with glee and the anticipation rose high. Their previous effort boasted one of the films of the last decade with a stunning central performance by Pitt (arguably his best to date) and contains some beautiful images by veteran cinematographer Roger Deakins. Now the pair return with a crime thriller set in the shadow of recession hit America. But will Killing Them Softly be as memorable as their last outing?

When small time criminals Frankie (Scoot McNairy) and drug addicted Russell (Ben Mendelsohn) are hired to hold up a high stakes mob poker game, they relish the chance because veteran gangster Markie Trattman (Ray Liotta) will get the blame due a similar incident previously while they get away clean! While the robbery is a success, the bosses sense that something doesn’t add up and it can be Markie’s doing. To find the suspect they bring in Enforcer Jackie Cogan (Brad Pitt) to find out what happened.

Although it is great to see Dominik and Pitt together again, sadly Killing Them Softly falls short of the mark. Being a crime thriller we’d expect to this to be punchy and very to the point. But the main story is somewhat confused through the use of overlong dialogue and conversations which seem to go on forever. Whether coincidental or not, the film feels inadequately edited and we feel that some key things may have been missed.

As a result the audience loses its way and in places we wonder exactly what is happening. In particular when James Gandolfini’s mob man Mickey arrives, it doesn’t seem clear exactly what he is there for? A script that was more sharp and concise could have worked wonders here because its magnificent cast has the ability to take it to the next level!

The theme of recession suffering USA in 2008 is a blessing and curse for Killing Them Softly, the idea that money has lost its value so people are struggling works well and adds to the desperation of pair moronic crooks at the beginning. But then we are subjected to repeated viewings of Barack Obama’s speeches to the masses on the eve of election and his believe that all of America was one.

Although there is a great speech by Jackie accusing Thomas Jefferson is writing lies about equality and sending people to war while he “Drunk his wine and fucked his slave girl!” this theme and the idea surrounding it largely gets in the way of action! By the end this feels like a thinly veiled attack on the state the world is in and gives a notion that in this planet we are all alone!

Brad Pitt’s presence easily elevates Killing Them Softly from above the norm! All clad in black his Jackie Cogan is all that is cool in cinema. He swaggers into the story like a rock star, but his face soon turns grim when he realises the mess he has to sort out! Pitt plays it with a suave edge, but also gives his character a hard centre where nothing will stop him taking care of business.

Scoot McNairy and Ben Mendelsohn are equally excellent as the pair of small fry’s who stumble into a giant hornet’s nest. McNairy’s humanity adds to the sympathy of his character being a lamb to the slaughter while Mendelsohn’s drug addict Russell provides the comic relief. Here is a man so lost in a haze, he willing confesses to committing the crime to the associates who are after him!

In a brief role Ray Liotta is fantastic as Markie, although he does feel a tad wasted as his early scenes where he forced to beg for his life are brilliant and we wish there could have been more him.

Killing Them Softly really should have been a film that delivered it all, with its great cast and talented director but aside from the performances, the visual are lacking and the story is askew. What is a solid thriller is let down its political commentary and it lengthy speeches. Dominik and Pitt make a great combination and we can only hope that they both get back on the horse quickly because based on the evidence- another classic is not far away!

Might & Magic: Excalibur Review

Classic from the Vault

Excalibur (1981)

Director: John Boorman

By Alex Watson

The legend of King Arthur and the knights of the roundtable have already been shown to us in a variety of different forms, with extremely varied results. For instance we have had laughs aplenty in Monty Python’s The Holy Grail (including some very rude Frenchmen), had Clive Owen and Keira Knightley’s bland offering of the tale in Antoine Fuqua’s King Arthur and more recently the disappointing TV adaptation Camelot starring Eva Green. But none of them have been more weird and wonderful than director John Boorman’s lavish adaptation, Excalibur. A film which took the legend to the next level and left many shocked.

Boorman’s version begins showing the reign of the brutish King Uther (Gabriel Byrne) who is at war with his rival Gorlois (Corin Redgrave). After Uther is given the magic sword Excalibur by sorcerer Merlin (Nicol Williamson) and war is briefly halted. But soon Uther is murdered by his enemies- before death he impales his magic into a rock and proclaims who ever pull’s it out will become king! Years later his son Arthur (Nigel Terry) becomes that man and reigns over Britain with Guinevere (Cherie Lunghi), but very soon his sorceress sister, Morgana (Helen Mirren) will bring his kingdom to ruins!

Excalibur is a very different kind of Arthurian legend because even though the usual reference such as the sword in the stone and The Lady of the Lake are present, it has a very mystic and supernatural air that surrounds it. This effect gives the film a dream like quality which is captured in a series of lush cinematography by Alex Thomson. Also unlike its predecessor’s Boorman’s film chooses to focus more on the blood spilt and the effects of sorcerery in this classic tale. In doing so it gets rid of any sentiment attached to the tale and shows how even the tightest bonds are tested.

Within the walls of Camelot is where the film really begins to fire because we show Arthur’s love for Guinevere tested by her budding attraction to handsome knight Lancelot (Nicholas Clay) which shall lead to an affair with devastating consequences. It is also within this walls were Morgana weaves her magic and quickly makes mincemeat of Merlin’s plan to destroy her in an epic and chest tightening showdown (I guarantee you will speaking the charm of making for days after).

Beyond the glorious sets and the fabulous photography there lays a dark cloud hanging over head and in Excalibur’s final act the feel of the film descends into a very different place. Under the influence of Morgana we see a kingdom decimated and from there things become a bit confusing in terms of story. But things are re-deemed with a thrilling and energetic final battle between Arthur and his bastard son Mordred where it will literally be the last man standing!

But the real stand out of Boorman’s film is the presence of Merlin, played with relish by Nicol Williamson (who died earlier this year). From the very beginning Merlin’s presence has an effect and his magic causes as many problems as it solves. Merlin played as both clairvoyant and con man and although nurturing to Arthur, his deeds will come to haunt him when he meet Morgana!

Nigel Terry gives a solid performance as the brave yet naive Arthur, whose heroics and trust in faith will shape the fortunes of all. He is matched by Nicholas Clay who gives a sexual charged performance as Lancelot, a man whose allegiance to Arthur will soon come under great strain. But its Helen Mirren who has the most presences as the serpent like Morgana! Her lusts of power lingers heavily her eyes as she lurks in the background watching her brother. Through Mirren she is given an ice cold feel and this carried across well in Excalibur’s latter stages.

Although this version may split viewers as the whether it is really a good telling of a true legend, this really is worth a view. Boorman’s Excalibur is one of the most visual stunning and surreal films you are ever likely to watch and with its great cast (watch from early performances from Patrick Stewart and Liam Neeson) it makes it an exhilarating drama. But be warned there will no one farting in the knights general direction in this movie!

Hearts On Fire: Review of Anna Karenina

Anna Karenina

Director: Joe Wright

By Alex Watson

Is Joe Wright the new generation of British film makers? Many seem to think so and based on his recent stunning efforts Atonement and Hanna the argument is solid. His real strength is his ability to produce films that are not only beautifully shot, but have stories that capture our hearts. So now we turn to his most ambitious movie yet, an adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s 864 page novel Anna Karenina. Will this effort be vintage Wright? Or will one of literatures most doomed romance be his un-doing?

Set in Imperial Russia in 1874, Anna Karenina (Keira Knightley) is involved in a passionless yet content marriage to state official Alexei Karenin (Jude Law). Then into her world comes dashing Calvary officer Count Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and very soon the two begin an affair which sends shockwaves through polite society. Although Anna is bound to her husband by god, she cannot deny true happiness with her lover.

So far this is Wright most accomplished picture and it is interesting that rather than showing Tolstoy’s novel straight, he has chosen to keep the bulk of the action to within an old Russian theatre and only occasionally strays into the outside world. This paves the way for some stunning set pieces, such as civil servants stamping papers in unison, a thrilling horse race and a truly beautiful ballroom scene where as Anna and Vronsky seductively dance- eyeballs widen all around! This restriction adds to the impressive feel of Anna Karenina and ensures that it will not be remembered as just another costume drama.

Whether or not you have read Tolstoy’s novel is irrelevant and Joe Wright isn’t setting out to simply to please the die-hard fans. Delivering the story page by page, would have been a task impossible even for him! So instead he simply wants to show the audiences a love story for the ages, however this area where his film falls down slightly. The central romance between Vronsky and Anna doesn’t quite grab at the heart like it should do and for large periods we are just counting the seconds for something wrong to emerge.

The real romance that gives a flutter to our hearts in the secondary romance between Levin (Domhnall Gleeson) and Kitty (Alicia Vikander), a pair from very different sides of society. After a painful refusal proposal by Kitty in the early stages, things feel over for the pair. But after a cruel heart break Kitty soon realizes where her heart lies. Cue a very tender scene where the pair spell out their love to each other using lettered blocks.

Wright’s muse Keira Knightley gives an impressive central performance as Anna and engages us throughout the film. She also gives Anna a layer of emotional complexion which gives an edge to her performance. Jude Law is quietly brilliant as Anna’s dull statesman husband, Karenin, this character is so often the forgotten man in this kind of drama. But in the hands of Law he gives him a haunted quality and his presence sticks to Anna throughout!

Aaron Taylor-Johnson looks the part of Vronsky and at first excels, but as the pieces wears on his involvement grows less interesting and we in fact yearn for Anna to leave him! Excellent support is given by Domnhall Gleeson and Alicia Vikander and the young lovers Levin and Kitty.

But it’s Joe Wright who is the real star of the film, with his stunning style he gives us many memorable images over the course of Anna Karenina and brings Imperial Russia truly to life. The move to shoot within the confines of a theatre may have been a bold one, but it has been a gamble worth taking. There is no doubt now that this man is the leading director in Britain, where it will take him next is anyone’s guess. I hope you are as excited as me!

Worlds Will Collide: The Crying Game Review

Classic From The Vault

The Crying Game (1992)

Director: Neil Jordan

By Alex Watson

What makes a truly great twist in a movie? Well the answer is simple, it has to be one that comes completely out of left field and leaves the audience with their jaws hanging wide open. There have been some truly great examples of this in recent years such as shock revelation of Bruce Willis’ character in The Sixth Sense or the notice board in The Usual Suspects. But no twist has been more shocking than in Irish director Neil Jordan’s masterpiece thriller- The Crying Game, a film which gave us a very different kind of romance.

Jordan’s film follows the exploits of Fergus (Stephan Rea) who is an IRA volunteer who along with his lover Jude (Miranda Richardson) assists in the kidnapping of British soldier Jody (Forest Whittaker). In the coming days Jody and Fergus become closer and an awkward friendship is formed. But then Fergus is called to shoot Jody soon after, before he does Jody asks Fergus back to London and take care of his girlfriend Dil (Jaye Davidson). After a British ambush whips out most of his companions, Fergus flees to London and finds Dil, only to end up falling in love! Very soon his past catches up with him and some tough choices are ahead.

The Crying Game is a rare gem of a film because it has more than just a love story and even if you already know the major twist that made this film famous; this is still an amazing viewing.  From the very start Dil sparks our interest and when we first meet her we realize that she is exactly as exotic as Jody as made out. But when we discover more about her, the illusion shatters before us! This kind of twist is one of the true greats and through Neil Jordan’s stunning script, it comes to life!

Love between two worlds is a one the big themes involved in Jordan’s film; Fergus as a man with a history of violence is at first racked with guilt over his involvement over Jody’s demise and feels even worse about his blossoming romance with Dil. After an early strain is put on their relationship, the pair is still very much attracted to each other and through this they are able to put their differences to one side and begin to love each other. Jody presence however still lurks in the background and Fergus is haunted by persistent dreams of him and is still trying to find the words to tell Dil what happened in Ireland!

Aside from the romance, The Crying Game has a suspense to it that is very claustrophobic and there is a sense that Fergus’ past isn’t completely dead. When it does surface, there are ripples in the water as Fergus is forced by Jude to partake in the assassination of a high ranking official to try and secure freedom for IRA prisoners. Fergus has put his old life behind him, but knows he will have to pay the cost to keep his love safe.

Stephen Rea gives a magnificent and complex performance as the haunted Fergus and as the film goes on we hope that he finds redemption for his actions. Through Rea’s everyman quality, this adds to Fergus’ likeability and ensures he holds a place in the audience’s heart. He is joined by Miranda Richardson who gives great support as the fiery and steadfast Jude. But The Crying Game belongs to Jaye Davidson who gives a fascinating turn as the mysterious Dil, as mentioned before her presence is wondered about from the very beginning and through Davidson’s great performance this is added to throughout the film-  especially when her past is revealed! Sadly Davidson only acted once more after this; a real presence in cinema was lost as a result!

The contents of the twist may have become public knowledge through constant pop culture references, but even in the face of that it is still as shocking as when it was first revealed! Neil Jordan’s film is one which will stick in your mind for weeks afterward and will always rate as one of Hollywood’s great thrillers. It will also demonstrate that love is powerful, no matter who you fall for!

Family Ties: Review of Lawless

Lawless

Director: John Hillcoat

By Alex Watson

Prohibition and the bootlegging of alcohol has been a hot topic in Hollywood over the years, in particular Brian De Palma’s The Untouchables set in Al Capone’s Chicago and Martin Scorsese critically acclaimed HBO drama Boardwalk Empire, which deals with Atlantic City. But what of the Deep South and the prosperous business that was there? Australian director John Hillcoat brings to the screen a tale of three notorious brothers in Virginia, whose exploits have become the thing of legend in his picture, Lawless.

This film focuses on the Bondurant brothers, who were three famous bootleggers in Virginia in the 1920’s, led by middle brother Forrest (Tom Hardy), drunken older brother Howard (Jason Clarke) and weak young brother Jack (Shia LaBeouf). They run their business like clockwork and have become very successful. But very soon they come across a major problem in the form of Chicago cop Charlie Rakes (Guy Pearce) who wants to cut down their operation. Family ties will be tested and violent methods will raise their head as the family tries to stay ahead.

Lawless is a film which seems very un-decided, one the hand we have a well made picture which demonstrates the strength of brotherhood, no matter what obstacles come across us.  But at times the film descends un-necessarily into more violence territory. This film feels like a companion of Hillcoat’s previous outback drama The Proposition which mixed brotherly love with extreme violence.

Hillcoat brings us a beautiful shot film in the shadow of the Appalachian Mountains and there is a wonderful collection of good old Southern songs to accompany it. But even with this beauty, the violence in it leaves a nasty after taste to it. In particular Rakes’ savage beating on Jack simply because he can do it! When Jack threatens that Forrest will hurt him, Rakes snidely replies “Well that’s not going to help you now is it?” cue a flurry of punches that even Muhammad Ali envy!

When we first meet the Bondurant boys, we know that Forrest among the locals is thought to be immortal and throughout the film this theory is tested. But Rakes makes his appearance, we can sense in the air that a bad change is imminent! On the surface he may appear foppish due to his slender black gloves and expensive suit. But underneath the well dressed manner there lies a sadistic undertone which will become their burden.

But when it fires Lawless can be impressive, the bond of brotherhood is what really holds this picture together. Through Forrest’s stern but loving demeanour we feel the strength of Bounderant family. They are presented as a bunch of dumb hicks who got lucky, but as men before their time with a great sense for business and had they been in today’s society they would probably have made a killing.

This film could well have been one of the pictures of the year and it had all the criteria to fit it. But overall it feels like a missed opportunity to delve deeply in a truly great story. Hillcoat’s familiar style is there for all to see, but that is the main problem with the picture is his insistence of on bringing us the ugly truth rather than telling us the story.

Mr consistent Tom Hardy gives another strong performance as Forrest, his brilliant physical presence gives the film its heart and we feel throughout that this isn’t a man to be trifled with. Shia LaBeouf is equally impressive as Jack, the young man with more ideas than guts, his eventually rise to becoming successful is one of the films more impressive elements.

As Charlie Rakes, Guy Pearce feels like a pantomime villain with his acidic tones and slicked back hair, Rakes has presence, but Pearce lacks the bite that is needs for this role. Gary Oldman is disappointingly underused as gangster Floyd Banner, despite a great early entrance; he seems to just disappear without trace! More of his inclusion could really have boosted this picture.

John Hillcoat has the potential to become a great director, The Proposition and The Road have demonstrated his ability. Lawless is not a bad picture by any means, but it is not a great one either. It is a shame that Hillcoat has not made more with his top draw cast because this film had the story to really carry them. No doubt next time around, this man will be back on form.

In Dreams: Review of Total Recall

Total Recall

Director: Len Wiseman

By Alex Watson

Re-makes, re-boots, re-imaginings- whatever you wish to call them, Hollywood these days is full of adaptations. Paul Verhoeven’s film Total Recall was a very weird but brilliantly entertaining piece back in 1990, with Arnold Schwarzenegger to anchor it as mysterious Mars miner Douglas Quaid the piece with its insane effects soon became a cult hit. When Die Hard 4.0 director Len Wiseman announced he was going to tackle this much loved tale, people responded in different ways and few thought that it could ever sum up for the mind trip effect of the original. What will Wiseman treating his new vision and more importantly, is it all a dream?

Like the original, Total Recall follows worker Doug Quaid (Colin Farrell) who lives with his beautiful wife Lori (Kate Beckinsale). Quaid is experiencing troubling dreams of a fabricated life as a spy agent where he is joined by Melina (Jessica Biel). To help ease his sleepless nights, Quaid pays a visit to Rekall- a place where synthetic memories are implanted and it will allow him to live out his dreams. Very soon Doug will discover that his dreams may yet be real… and soon the enemy, led by the evil Chancellor Cohaagen (Bryan Cranston) are closing in!

Len Wiseman is to be commended for his efforts to bring a new approach on this aged classic, and there are also kind hints to P.H’s original such as the three breasted lady and the ‘Two Weeks’ woman. But sadly it is there the complements shall stop because although visual spectacular, his Total Recall falls far short of the original. While the original gave a great deal of un-expected laughs in the frame of Arnie’s one liners, the new script by Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback just feels plain and formulaic and seems un-concerned with giving anything even slight absurd!

The initial story was similar, though Verhoevens was set on Mars, but the feather in the cap of the original was that we could never tell whether or not Quaid’s world was all a dream?  Here the situation is made clear very early and very soon this piece just descends into a typical shoot out and loses the element of mystery to it.

One place where the new Total Recall does spark an intrigue is in the representation of a world torn apart from chemical warfare. Earth is now divided into United Federation of Britain, and the Colony, which are constantly at war with each other. But due to a complex explanation about how this came about, it quickly loses us. What this scenario lacks is a strong villain controlling the middle, the Cohaagen of old was a true tyrant, one that previous villain Ronnie Cox was a specialist at! The new boss just feels as if a stiff breeze will topple him!

Colin Farrell easily betters his performance over that of Schwarzenegger, particularly in the beginning stages when Quaid‘s old persona is re awakened, and it truly terrifies him!  But a man of his talents can surely do better than being stuck in something like this? Kate Beckinsale does well as Quaid’s wife turned eventual villain Lori, her conversion from loving missus the giving a flying kick into Doug’s face does shock us!

Beckinsale thoroughly out muscles Jessica Biel in the female acting department, Biel although good eye candy doesn’t really register as the film goes and we start to wonder why her character is really involved. The fantastic Bryan Cranston however, is short changed as the villain and unlike his terrific Walter White on TV’s Breaking Bad; he isn’t given nearly enough meat to sink his teeth into. Someone please give this man the role he deserves.

Although it will probably bring the money into the box office, Len Wiseman’s Total Recall probably won’t be remembered as fondly as Verhoevens. It does bring its own original ideas but it does have either the comedic or the strangeness that made the original so memorable! It does make you wonder what the next Arnie adaptation will be… Jingle All the Way anyone???